- CBA on
- CBA Media
CBA: McCaskill-Perdue Risk Legislation Good for Consumers, Necessary for Regulators
Washington, D.C. – The Consumer Bankers Association today wrote Senators Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and David Perdue (R-Ga.) to offer support for the Systemic Risk Designation Improvement Act, bipartisan legislation designed to give the Federal Reserve flexibility when making systemic risk designations.
“Designating risk based on how big a financial institution is does not make sense and it hurts consumers,” CBA President and CEO Richard Hunt said when sending the letter. “This legislation allows regulators to take a big-picture view of risk by looking at the activities a financial institution undertakes instead of a simple assets threshold. Examining multiple risk factors is more telling and can reduce unnecessary compliance burdens that limit credit availability to consumers.”
Similar legislation sponsored by Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.) passed the U.S. House of Representatives last year.
The full letter is below:
September 29, 2017
The Honorable Claire McCaskill The Honorable David Perdue
U.S. Senate U.S. Senate
503 Hart Senate Office Building 383 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20002 Washington, D.C. 20002
Dear Senators McCaskill and Perdue:
On behalf of the Consumer Bankers Association (CBA), I write in support of S. 1893, the
Systemic Risk Designation Improvement Act. CBA is the voice of the retail banking industry whose products and services provide access to credit for consumers and small businesses. Our members operate in all 50 states, serve more than 150 million Americans, and collectively hold two-thirds of the country’s total depository assets.
Currently, the Dodd-Frank Act designates a financial institution as systemically important if it meets or exceeds an arbitrary $50 billion asset threshold. This asset threshold is a flawed approach used by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) to assess the risk an institution poses to the American financial system. S. 1893 would more appropriately gauge the systemic risk of an institution by measuring the complexity, scale, and activities of the institution.
Requiring the evaluation of multiple risk factors, as opposed to the use of a simple asset size calculation, will provide regulators a more accurate systemic risk profile of an institution and can reduce unnecessary and burdensome compliance measures that increase operating costs and limit credit availability to consumers. CBA strongly supports S. 1893 and encourages the Senate to pass this important legislation.
President and CEO
Consumer Bankers Association