- CBA on
- CBA Media
New Congressional Investigation: Fintechs Fueled Rampant PPP Fraud & Abuse
Last week, the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, following a months-long and ongoing investigation, released a report examining the depth and breadth of fraud and abuse from fintech firms participating in the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). Specifically, the Select Subcommittee found these firms reaped “billions in fees from taxpayers while becoming easy targets for those who sought to defraud the [program].”
Six fintech firms were specifically highlighted in the new Congressional report as examples of those that turned a blind eye in their quest to maximize fees while neglecting basic fraud prevention controls to accept and facilitate PPP loan applications that very clearly did not qualify.
- Among the issues uncovered, fintech firms accepted applications from companies with basic errors, including the submission of incorrect tax documents, names and addresses which did not match, and applications which were likely the product of identity theft.
- Alarmingly, the report concluded that errors were not isolated but were rather a pattern of mismanagement and malfeasance from senior leadership at fintech companies.
The matter has been referred to the Department of Justice and the Small Business Administration’s Inspector General for further investigation.
The watchdog committee confirmed what a study by University of Texas found last year: fintechs were nearly five times more likely than traditional lenders to be involved with suspicious loans.Furthermore, nine out of the top ten lenders with the highest rates of suspicious PPP loans were fintech firms.
What They’re Saying
“Even as these companies failed in their administration of the program, they nonetheless accrued massive profits from program administration fees, much of which was pocketed by the companies’ owners and executives. On top of the windfall obtained by enabling others to engage in PPP fraud, some of these individuals may have augmented their ill-gotten gains by engaging in PPP fraud themselves.”
“PPP funds were meant to help small businesses stay afloat during the pandemic—not fintech executives looking to get rich. @COVIDOversight has revealed several execs may have abused the program—and has asked SBA, OIG, and DOJ to take further action.”
Why It Matters
This waste and abuse of taxpayer money – which was intended to help small businesses and workers during a very dire time– is unfortunate and could have been avoided. CBA has long called on policymakers to recognize the risks associated with the rapid growth of unregulated fintechs and other non-bank providers, which are not held to the same broad federal oversight requirements as traditional banks. This investigative report underscores why expanded oversight and similar data security and privacy standards for these providers are so critically needed.
The nation’s leading banks, on the other hand, proudly distributed the vast majority of PPP loans – and they did so responsibly. In fact, large banks provided more than half of all PPP funds ($408.7 billion) and extended 4.1 million loans.
- Banks adhered to the robust regulatory and consumer protection requirements while also processing 30 years’ worth of 7(a) SBA loan volume within the first two weeks for the PPP program.
- Many of the nation’s largest banks also waived or donated all fees related to processing PPP loans. They stepped up, professionally and with integrity, during our nation’s greatest time of need.
In addition to established protocols for responsible lending, banks have existing relationships with businesses of all sizes across the country. These relationships helped large banks administer the program and ensure that legitimate businesses could access needed capital.
The Bottom Line: Washington Must Act
As opposed to fintechs and crypto firms, America’s leading banks are required by law to adhere to stringent federal oversight, data security, privacy, and consumer protection standards. This regulatory disparity has serious implications for consumers and the financial system.
- The findings from this report should serve as further impetus for the Administration, and specifically the Small Business Administration (SBA), to abandon their proposal to expand the SBA’s signature (7a) small business lending program to fintechs and nonbanks.
It should also prompt policymakers to modernize the rules of the road and ensure every American receives the high level of protections they deserve, regardless of where they go to meet their financial needs.